Luigi Mangione

Posts Attachments
Sort by date Most Liked Posts
Scott1636 said:
CEO Killing Could Cost Heir Inheritance
The grandmother of Luigi Mangione, the man accused of the murder of UnitedHealthCare® CEO Brian Thompson, reportedly left tens of millions of dollars to her children and grandchildren after she passed away on one condition: any grandchild who wanted to inherit money could not be "charged, indicted, convicted of, or plead guilty to a felony," as reported by PEOPLE.
Click to expand...

^^That's not what the following article states. That money has already been issued. Mary Mangione died March 15, 2023 with her 10 living children being the beneficiaries of her will - not her grandchildren. An estimated fortune of $30 million was distributed among them:

Who is Luigi Mangione's grandmother? Mary Mangione left millions in will
 
  • Like
Reactions: DadsAreUs, 12loner, crimewave12 and 4 others
  • Like
Reactions: TheUnbearableLightnessOfBeing and dreamer20
Trentmogul said:
To everyone that wants to send photos you can through Shutterfly .

Each photo will be reviewed by AUTHORITIES prior to approval and
Luigi just kindly ask
“ you send no more than Five at a time. “
Click to expand...
Photos of what? Bussy?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: ibrokemyheart, dreamer20, E P and 2 others
cody865 said:
Luigi opening up the letters and seeing endless pictures of bussy: 😮
Click to expand...
I wonder if that hunky guard of his hand delivers each letter “got ur letters Luigi…crawl to daddy and come get it”
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Wow
Reactions: plasticappels, TheUnbearableLightnessOfBeing, Saucybooty and 8 others
Trentmogul said:
To everyone that wants to send photos you can through Shutterfly .

Each photo will be reviewed by AUTHORITIES prior to approval and
Luigi just kindly ask
“ you send no more than Five at a time. “
Click to expand...
Joke's on law enforcement, I want them all to see my dick. Pass me around the department.
cody865 said:
Luigi opening up the letters and seeing endless pictures of bussy: 😮
Click to expand...
I should send him a pic of my lips, so he knows when he gets out he doesn't need to worry about his back. I'll do all the work as the throat GOAT.
 
  • Haha
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: TheUnbearableLightnessOfBeing, sausage_lover, howcomebubblegum and 6 others
What do y'all think Luigi Mangione's defence will be?

1. Mistaken identity (he is not the shooter despite supposed evidence)
2. Insanity (he honestly could not tell right from wrong despite apparent premeditation and fleeing the scene)
3. Social justice (he believes that the shooting victim deserved it for his perceived wrongs, and he is not sorry for the killing)
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheUnbearableLightnessOfBeing
ShaitanIblis said:
What do y'all think Luigi Mangione's defence will be?

1. Mistaken identity (he is not the shooter despite supposed evidence)
2. Insanity (he honestly could not tell right from wrong despite apparent premeditation and fleeing the scene)
3. Social justice (he believes that the shooting victim deserved it for his perceived wrongs, and he is not sorry for the killing)
Click to expand...
No judge would allow a lawyer to run the third defense
 
  • Like
Reactions: sausage_lover, Wondering12, TheUnbearableLightnessOfBeing and 3 others
Just FYI for all those jury nullification peeps
They found a jury for Ted Bundy, and Donald Trump
It is very likely that they can find 12 people who don't follow the news obsessively to serve
And no, defense lawyers are not allowed to bring up jury nullification
 
  • Like
Reactions: sausage_lover, TheUnbearableLightnessOfBeing and SmokedPython
Awww, raspberries.
bymyname said:
Just FYI for all those jury nullification peeps
They found a jury for Ted Bundy, and Donald Trump
It is very likely that they can find 12 people who don't follow the news obsessively to serve
And no, defense lawyers are not allowed to bring up jury nullification, r
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: sausage_lover and TheUnbearableLightnessOfBeing
ShaitanIblis said:
What do y'all think Luigi Mangione's defence will be?

1. Mistaken identity (he is not the shooter despite supposed evidence)
2. Insanity (he honestly could not tell right from wrong despite apparent premeditation and fleeing the scene)
3. Social justice (he believes that the shooting victim deserved it for his perceived wrongs, and he is not sorry for the killing)
Click to expand...
His current lawyer is a commentator on CNN and before she was his attorney said it would likely be an insanity defense because the evidence was so overwhelming.

I believe the other defense could be that he didn't do it - either by an alibi that hasn't been reported or having some of the police investigation disqualified.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sausage_lover, TheUnbearableLightnessOfBeing, cody865 and 1 other person
In the days after Luigi Mangione’s arrest at a McDonald’s in Altoona, Penn., New York Police Department (NYPD) Commissioner Jessica Tisch publicly claimed that the gun recovered on Mangione at the time of his arrest “matched” shell casings recovered from the crime scene where health insurance CEO Brian Thompson was fatally shot in New York City.1

Media companies quickly reported these claims – that cartridge casings recovered at the scene of the shooting “matched” the test fires from Mangione’s gun – even though this type of opinion is not supported by science. The sharing of this information without independent investigation of the reliability of the evidence is not entirely surprising given the misconceptions of forensic evidence portrayed in movies, TV, and public imagination.

As a public defender for over a decade, I have spent much of my career litigating forensic evidence and fighting against the misuse of science and surveillance both in individual criminal cases and at the systemic level. I can speak firsthand to the struggle public defenders face in the courtroom combatting the misconceptions held by judges and juries alike that forensic evidence is objective, reliable, and infallible. This is why it is so troubling to see these claims of a “match” in Mangione’s case perpetuated by not only the media but defense lawyers as well.2

Reporting these forensic opinions as facts dangerously overstates the reliability and strength of the pattern-matching evidence and is uniquely misleading to jurors.3 There are many reasons to question the validity of the firearms (and fingerprint) comparisons in Mangione’s case.4

Rather than accept the NYPD’s opinions at face value, lawyers can use this case to correct common misconceptions about forensics’ infallibility and to debunk the myth of the “match.” This article addresses some of the scientific critiques of the pattern-matching methods with the hope of making them part of the public discourse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zarnekau, sausage_lover, Genjinokimi and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom